Re: 2.6.0-test11-mm1

[Andrew Morton]

Thomas Molina <tmolina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quite frankly I am becoming concerned about the number of patches that are 
>  queued for post 2.6.0.  It is beginning to look like 2.6.0 might be nice 
>  and quiet while 2.6.1+ are going to be quite messy as all the things "on 
>  hold" get put in.

Well, most of these things do address real problems.  It's a matter of
feeding them in at an appropriate rate and with a higher level of testing.

>  I'm going to do my part by pounding heavily on -mm kernels since that 
>  appears where all this is ending up.

That would be useful.  Testing on non-ia32 platforms remains a concern.  I
test on ia64 and ppc64, but I'm not aware of anyone regularly testing -mm
things on other architectures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/