Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??

[Balram Adlakha]

John Bradford (john@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
> names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
> altogether during 2.7.
>
> John.

Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
is newer?

-- 
 -
( ) ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail 
 X
/ \ 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/