Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC"

[Nick Piggin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is
> the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and
> solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it.

Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So
I guess I agree with it.

Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for
it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too
(not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while)

Relevant patches are
sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch
sched-fork-cleanup.patch
sched-migrate-comment.patch
sched-style.patch
sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/