Re: [PATCH] another minor bit of cpumask cleanup

[Paul Jackson]

wli wrote:
> so as to counter the implication that all I did back then was
> crap gibberish all over the tree

Sorry you're feeling picked on and under appreciated.

It really doesn't matter to me by whom or how this came to be.  More
than once in my career, I have cleaned up some stuff, then out of
curiosity gone back to see who might have written such crap -- only to
discover it was I.  I've learned to not ask such questions.  Just keep
on trying to make things better.

We are working on a large and ever changing body of code with thousands
of others active at any point.  The opportunities for refinement and
improvement are endless.  Don't sweat how we got here; those who have
done the most (such as yourself) probably have created the most
"opportunities" for further refinment.  Just judge each change on its
current merits, and on whether it moves in the right long term
directions.

See further:
    Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming
    http://builder.com.com/5100-6404-1045782.html

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/