[PATCH] Another dm and bio problem with 2.6.0
From: Mark Haverkamp
Date: Mon Dec 22 2003 - 12:44:07 EST
This fixes a problem similar to the patch I submitted on 11/20
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106936439707962&w=2
In this case, though, the result is an:
"Incorrect number of segments after building list" message.
The macro __BVEC_START assumes a bi_idx of zero when the dm code can
submit a bio with a non-zero bi_idx.
The code has been tested on an 8 way / 8gb OSDL STP machine with a 197G
lvm volume running dbt2 test.
===== include/linux/bio.h 1.34 vs edited =====
--- 1.34/include/linux/bio.h Sun Sep 21 14:50:33 2003
+++ edited/include/linux/bio.h Wed Dec 17 07:17:53 2003
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
*/
#define __BVEC_END(bio) bio_iovec_idx((bio), (bio)->bi_vcnt - 1)
-#define __BVEC_START(bio) bio_iovec_idx((bio), 0)
+#define __BVEC_START(bio) bio_iovec_idx((bio), (bio)->bi_idx)
#define BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(vec1, vec2) \
((bvec_to_phys((vec1)) + (vec1)->bv_len) == bvec_to_phys((vec2)))
#define BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(vec1, vec2) \
--
Mark Haverkamp <markh@xxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/