Re: 2.6.0 modules don't link properly

[Andre Tomt]

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 00:17, bill davidsen wrote:
> I tried building 2.6.0-final on a new whitebox-3.0-final install, and
> the modules_install produced thousands of unresolved symbols. This built
> on another machine I've been running and updating since the 2.5.3x days,
> so there might be something I've missed, but I don't quite see what it
> would be.
> 
> Whitebox is built from RH-ES-3.0 source, so the only things I updated
> were the procps and modutils, using the last tar which didn't have "pre"
> in the name. I see that there is a new tar, out nearly ten hours so it
> must be stable, which has jumped from 0.9.15 to 3.0.15-pre1, but I'm
> happily using something months old on other systems.
> 
> Can someone toss me a clue? Has anyone had a working build with
> RH-ES-3.0? Yes, I know other things need to be done before I can
> actually run the kernel, but being able to build would be nice, since I
> got a new test system just for 2.6 test/demo use.

Sounds like a case of missing module-init-tools.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/