Re: [PATCH] seq_file version of /proc/interrupts

[Andrew Morton]

corbet@xxxxxxx (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:
>
> > -	int i, j;
> > +	int i = *(int *) v, j;
> 
> > That int * has to be a loff_t * or bad things will happen on a 64bit big
> > endian platform :)
> 
> You mean the world's not all an x86?  What are things coming to?
> 
> Andrew, Marc, this seems almost certain to the the source of the problem
> you brought to my attention.  I'll try to get a supplemental patch to you
> tomorrow.  Obviously, it should be a loff_t for all architectures, even if
> it works for most now.

hmm, I seem to have already fixed pppc64.  I'll fix up the other
architectures.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/