Re: DevFS vs. udev

From: Xavier Bestel
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 09:26:47 EST


Le mer 24/12/2003 à 14:44, Ian Soboroff a écrit :
> Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I have to admit that devfs is the best, hands down, at a crucial lkml
> > exercise: the flamefest. It seems even after it'll die, it will continue
> > to attract devotees and flames.
>
> Perhaps the devfs devotees will maintain their code in BK, and we can
> merge two perennial lkml flamewars into one.

BK flames seem so passé to me. Throw in a new durable API to enable
binary-only device drivers, and you just built the perfect flamethrower.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/