Re: GCC 3.4 Heads-up

From: David Lloyd
Date: Mon Dec 29 2003 - 11:16:04 EST


On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Andy Isaacson wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 08:34:33PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The cast/conditional expression as lvalue are _particularly_ ugly
> > extensions, since there is absolutely zero point to them. They are very
> > much against what C is all about, and writing something like this:
> >
> > a ? b : c = d;
> >
> > is something that only a high-level language person could have come up
> > with. The _real_ way to do this in C is to just do
> >
> > *(a ? &b : &c) = d;
> >
> > which is portable C, does the same thing, and has no strange semantics.
>
> But doesn't the first one potentially let the compiler avoid spilling to
> memory, if b and c are both in registers?

I can't imagine anything wrong with:

if (a) b = d else c = d;

- D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/