Re: Problem with CONFIG_SYSCTL disabled

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明]

In article <1074521369.6070.99.camel@pegasus> (at Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:09:29 +0100), Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> so it is not needed to wrap the inclusion of linux/sysctl.h around
> #ifdef's, but why is it done so many times?
> 
> 	net/core/neighbour.c
> 	net/ipv4/devinet.c
> 	net/ipv4/arp.c
> 	net/ipv4/route.c
> 	net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
> 	net/ipv6/route.c
> 	net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> 	net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> 	net/ipv6/icmp.c
> 	net/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.c
> 	net/bridge/br_netfilter.c

Compilation time?

If one does not require linux/sysctl.h without CONFIG_SYSCTL,
you don't need to include it.

--yoshfuji

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/