Re: [PATCH] some more fixes for inode.c

[David Woodhouse]

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 08:06 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The first chunk refiles the inode on the inode_unused_pagecache
> list if needed, 

Looks sane.

> but I'm not 100% sure we need that change, since
> maybe only completely unused inodes can end up here. David ?

No, I don't see any reason why that should be the case; you can get
iput() called for an inode which happens to have data in the page cache.
This part of the patch is needed.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/