Re: [patch] increse MAX_NR_MEMBLKS to same as MAX_NUMNODES on NUMA

[Martin J. Bligh]

>>>>>> "Martin" == Martin J Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:24:52PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>> I think Martin is referring to the memblk_*line() functions and
>>>> the fact that memblks are exported via sysfs to userspace.  That
>>>> API hasn't proven very useful so far since it's really waiting for
>>>> memory hot add/remove.  Of course, we'll still need structures to
>>>> support that for the low level arch specific discontig code, so
>>>> any patch that killed memblks in sysfs and elsewhere would have to
>>>> take that into account...  (In particular, node_memblk[] is filled
>>>> out by the ACPI SRAT parsing code and use for discontig init and
>>>> physical->node id conversion.)
>>>> 
>>>> Jesse
>>>  OK, that makes sense.
> 
> Martin> Could one of you test this patch for me? Probably just a build
> Martin> would do fine.
> 
> Martin,
> 
> Tried it, no go! It conflicts with arch/ia64/mm/numa.c and
> arch/ia64/mm,/discontig.c as Jack had suggested.

Can you send me the build output? It shouldn't conflict ... there are two
separate uses of the term "memblk" by the looks of it.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/