Re: [PATCH 2.6] Altix updates

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:12:47PM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote:
> Guess I don't understand your point. Do you want us to create separate 
> functions for soft-struct and bridge address
> and TIO and non-TIO - 4 functions for each register access, rather than 1 ?

The right fix would be to only have one, and that one would take the
bridge_t.  If you really want to have one that takes the pcibr_soft, too
make it a small wrapper.  But even that would be two and not four, where
do the other two come from?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/