Re: buggy raid checksumming selection?

[Dave Jones]

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:22:33AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

 > >> Uhh. correct me if I am wrong, but shouldnt it select the fastest 
 > >algorithm?
 > >
 > >No, if it can choose a function which avoids polluting the cache over
 > >one that doesn't, it will.  Even if that means slightly less raw throughput
 > >
 > >This comes up time after time, maybe we need a printk in that case ?
 > 
 > How about removing the entire output? Is it really needed?

It's probably on a par with http://www.hadess.net/files/stuff/vpenis.c  8-)
You have a point though, it probably is pointless these days.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/