Re: gcc 2.95.3

[Stef van der Made]

Matthew Reppert wrote:

> snip
>  

> Many people have been using gcc-3.2 or later to build kernels, and I
> haven't really heard of any problems with this, at least on i386. I
> personally have used 3.2.2 and 3.3.2 (well, with Debian's patches) and
> haven't had any weirdness with 2.6 or 2.4. ISTR there being arches that
> need 3.x to compile, but I could be mistaken.
>
> 2.95.3 is definitely the *oldest* compiler you'd want to use, and pretty
> much skip between that and 3.2.
>
> Matt
>  
Same here. I've been using gcc3.2.0 and beyond currently 3.3.2 since the 
day they were released and never had any big issues. I would recomend 
using gcc 3.3.2 since it improves performance when using optimizations 
quite a bit as far as I can remember the statistics.

Stef
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/