Re: PATCH - ext2fs privacy (i.e. secure deletion) patch

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> >Perhaps this should still be controlled by (chattr(1)) [its already
> >documented, just not yet implemented].
> >
> >       When a file with the `s' attribute set is deleted, its blocks
> >	are zeroed and written back to the disk.
> >
> >...at which point config option is not really neccessary.
> >
> 
> You're not the first person to mention this to me, Pádraig, brought this 
> up on the day I posted. I certainly thing the 's' options should be 
> implemented, however for a privacy patch I believe that the user 
> shouldn't have to intervene to ensure a file is securely erased. It 
> makes more sense to me, as a lazy person, that the file system should be 
> set to always remove the file content... that way the user doesn't need 
> to get involved.
> 
> All that said, the user's content is something that the user could be 
> considered responsible for erasing themselves. The meta-data is the part 
> of the file which they dont' have access to, so having privacy 
> capabilities for meta-data erasure is a requirement. User data 
> erasure... I can take it or leave it. I think it should be automatic if 
> at all, but I'm not really that bothered about it.

Well, doing it on-demand means one less config option, and possibility
to include it into 2.7... It should be easy to have tiny patch forcing
that option always own for your use...
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/