Re: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer intheLinux kernel

[Randy.Dunlap]

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:55:54 -0800 "Woodruff, Robert J" <woody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| I think what started the discussion was that
| if anyone wanted to look at the code and start to comment 
| before we have a 2.6 patch ready they can download it from bitkeeper at
| 
| http://infiniband.bkbits.net/iba

Not Found
The requested URL /iba was not found on this server.


| or if you want, I could post a tar ball of the latest BK change set on
| sourceforge,
| or you can wait till we make all the changes to the makefiles, etc, to
| allow it to 
| easily integrate into the 2.6 build environment.
| 
| Any preference ?

yes, tarball for me....

Thanks,   [and please don't top-post]
---
~Randy


| -----Original Message-----
| From: Randy.Dunlap [mailto:rddunlap@xxxxxxxx] 
| Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:40 PM
| To: Christoph Hellwig
| Cc: Hefty, Sean; ftillier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
| greg@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hozer@xxxxxxxxx;
| woody@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Magro, Bill; woody@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
| infiniband-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: Re: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in
| theLinux kernel
| 
| 
| On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:40:43 +0000 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
| 
| | On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:26:46PM -0800, Hefty, Sean wrote:
| | > Personally, I'm amazed that professional developers have to discuss 
| | > or defend modular, portable code.
| | > 
| | > Once the code has been submitted, then specific implementation 
| | > problems can be dealt with.
| | 
| | *plonk*
| 
| 
| Christoph, he didn't say merged.  Let them submit it for review... and
| then comment on it.
| 
| --
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/