Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Fri Feb 06 2004 - 04:24:56 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> I don't think I was arguing against it completely, exactly because I'm
> just saying it should be optional.

And the result is that the current fast syscall handling on x86-64 is
completely unacceptable. If it's not change security enhancements are
not possible since the libc has to hardcode the address.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAI10P2ijCOnn/RHQRAuegAKCtk8W1cXWKlTWkDrmfJfykzvqATQCfRX4Q
cUVAR4+yIue/MFRL2xNbwfQ=
=VHoF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/