Re: [PATCH] PCI Update for 2.6.3-rc1

From: Adam Belay
Date: Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:23:15 EST


On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:46:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Greg KH wrote:
> > > ChangeSet 1.1500.11.2, 2004/01/30 16:34:48-08:00, ambx1@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > [PATCH] PCI: Remove uneeded resource structures from pci_dev
> > >
> > > The following patch remove irq_resource and dma_resource from pci_dev. It
> > > appears that the serial pci driver depends on irq_resource, however, it may be
> > > broken portions of an old quirk. I attempted to maintain the existing behavior
> > > while removing irq_resource. I changed FL_IRQRESOURCE to FL_NOIRQ. Russell,
> > > could you provide any comments? irq_resource and dma_resource are most likely
> > > remnants from when pci_dev was shared with pnp.
> >
> > FYI, at least one ISDN driver seems to need it as well:
> >
> > | drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/b1isa.c: In function `b1isa_init':
> > | drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/b1isa.c:183: structure has no member named `irq_resource'
>
> Ick, I don't really think we want users trying to override the irq
> number of their pci cards...

Yeah, I have plans for a struct isa_dev in 2.7. It seems we currently
have a few cases of drivers sharing pci_dev.

>
> Here's the patch that fixes this, and one other isdn driver up. ISDN
> people, feel free to add this to your huge patch :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>


It occured to me that we also have the following related code in pci.h:

--- a/include/linux/pci.h 2004-01-09 06:59:33.000000000 +0000
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h 2004-02-10 17:51:08.000000000 +0000
@@ -362,8 +362,6 @@
#define PCI_DMA_NONE 3

#define DEVICE_COUNT_COMPATIBLE 4
-#define DEVICE_COUNT_IRQ 2
-#define DEVICE_COUNT_DMA 2
#define DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE 12

/*

Perhaps this should be removed as well?

A quick compile and cscope didn't reveal any dependencies but it's
difficult to be positive.

Thanks,
Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/