On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:32:31PM -0500, Timothy Miller wrote:
For writes, iozone found an upper bound of about 10megs/sec, which is abysmal. Typically, I'd expect writes to be faster (on a single drive) than reads, because once the write is sent, you can forget about it. You don't have to wait around for something to come back, and that latency for reads can hurt performance. The OS can also buffer writes and reorder them in order to improve efficiency.
I'm joining this thread rather late, so perhaps I missed something. What hardware is the test being ran on? I have an AMD MPX based setup which suffers from a chipset bug which effectively limits writes to ~25MB/sec to devices connected via the 768 southbridge. Maybe something similar with your hardware?