Re: hweight64

[Andi Kleen]

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:55:43 +0530
"Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Pavel and kgdb gurus,
> 
> I inherited this change from x86_64 patch. Probably it was required on x86_64. 
> I can't think of any reason why it is necessary.
> 
> Unless someone finds a problem with this patch, I am going to apply it.

You can just remove it. It's not needed. kgdb does not even use hweight*

I checked some time ago with Jim Houston (from which it originated) and he said 
it was a merging error leaking from some Concurrent internal tree.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/