IPsec 2.6 fragmentation issue(s)

[Valentijn Sessink]

Hello list,

As sent to linux-net: I'm having various problems with 2.6 IPsec and
fragmentation. Most notably, the following - between host valentijn (2.6.1)
and host21 there's a Wifi IPsec tunnel:

  valentijn:~# ping -s 1435 host21
  PING host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl (10.15.67.21): 1435 data bytes
  ping: sendto: Message too long
  ping: wrote host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl 1443 chars, ret=-1
  ping: sendto: Message too long
  ping: wrote host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl 1443 chars, ret=-1

Resetting the MTU on the network interface helps:

  valentijn:~# ifconfig eth1 mtu 1400
  valentijn:~# ping -s 1417 host21
  PING host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl (10.15.67.21): 1417 data bytes
  1425 bytes from 10.15.67.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=93.0 ms
  1425 bytes from 10.15.67.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=78.2 ms

Then, resetting it to 1500 again does this:
valentijn:~# ifconfig eth1 mtu 1500
valentijn:~# ping -s 1435 host21
  PING host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl (10.15.67.21): 1435 data bytes
  ping: sendto: Message too long
  ping: wrote host21.wireless.palmgracht.nl 1443 chars, ret=-1
  1443 bytes from 10.15.67.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=89.0 ms
  1443 bytes from 10.15.67.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=79.9 ms

These MTU difficulties seem to propagate to a whole set of tunneling
difficulties, none of them clear enough to mention here, as my other side is
still a 2.4.24-with-IPsec backport. I'll try to set up a 2.6 machine there,
too, and report findings.

(If there's a better place to discuss 2.6 IPsec, please say so.)

Best regards,

Valentijn
-- 
http://www.openoffice.nl/   Open Office - Linux Office Solutions
Valentijn Sessink  valentyn+sessink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/