Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB update for 2.6.3

[David Brownell]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Yes. I also remember a time where the dma mask for the DMA API was all
> broken too (would not be possible to map the PCI one on top of it),
> but I think that got fixed. 

I thought it was still broken.  Last I compared different asm-* arch
implementations of dma_supported(), the semantics were inconsistent.
The "mask" was sometimes ignored, sometimes treated as an upper
bound on the address, once I recall it even being used as a mask!
Some of that inconsistency seemed to come from PCI though.

- Dave


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/