Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB update for 2.6.3

[Alan Stern]

Just to clear up a small disagreement...

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:10:41 +1100
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hrm... so if the USB device drivers are actually doing the dma mapping
> > > themselves, it make sense for them to pass their own struct device, no ?
> > 
> > That's right, at least that was the idea.
> 
> No. That would be _fundamentally_ wrong.
> 
> There's no way a USB device can do DMA in the first place. It has no DMA 
> controller, and no way to read/write memory except through the USB host.
> 
> So it is the host - and only the host - that matters. Anything else is a 
> bug.

Both of you are right.  Linus is right that USB devices don't do DMA.  
Ben is right that sometimes a USB device _driver_ will set up a DMA 
mapping.  And of course, it is set up on behalf of the corresponding USB 
controller, so the controller's struct device would be passed.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/