Re: Fix silly thinko in sungem network driver.

[David S. Miller]

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:12:03 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 11:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 09:29, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > ChangeSet 1.1584, 2004/02/20 14:29:11-08:00, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > 	Fix silly thinko in sungem network driver.
> > > 	
> > 
> > Argh. Actually, the patch is wrong as we are losing the 2 other
> > magic bits (the RonPaul bit, dunno what it is, that's how it's
> > called by Apple, end the other bugfix bit, some more apple magic).
> > 
> > Fixed patch on its way ... (as soon as I finish pulling, don't
> > cancel that cset, I'll apply a patch on top of it)
> 
> Here it is:

I thought the idea was that if IBURST doesn't stick, then the Apple specific
bits aren't implemented?

That's what the comment says.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/