Re: explicit dcache <-> user-space cache coherency, sys_mark_dir_clean(), O_CLEAN

[Keith Owens]

On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:58:53 +0100, 
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> perhaps using a simple 64-bit generation counter would be better.
>> Samba would get a new syscall to get the sum of each generation
>> counter down to the root dentry - a total validation of the pathname.
>> If the counter matches with that in the userspace cache entry then no
>> need to re-create the cache. Such generation counters would be usable
>> for multiple file servers as well. Hm?
>
>generation counters are problematic if they are not persistent. But
>there's a pretty natural persistent 'generation counter' which could be
>used for Samba's purpose: the mtime of the directory ...
>... monotonity is important: two successive directory operations to not be
>possible within the same nanosecond.

Why do you need monotonity?  Samba only cares if the dcache entry
changes, the indicator from kernel to user space does not have to be
monotonically increasing, just different.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/