Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1

[Ed Tomlinson]

On February 22, 2004 09:28 pm, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > On February 21, 2004 10:28 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> >>>Maybe gradual page-cache pressure could shirnk the slab?
> >>
> >>What happened to the experiment of having slab pages on the (in)active
> >>lists and letting them be free'd that way? Didn't somebody already do
> >>that? Ed Tomlinson and Craig Kulesa?
> >
> > You have a good memory.
> >
> > We dropped this experiment since there was a lot of latency between the
> > time a slab page became freeable and when it was actually freed.  The
> > current call back scheme was designed to balance slab preasure and
> > vmscaning.
>
> Does it really matter if there is a lot of latency?  How does this
> affect real-world results?  IOW, if it's not at the end of the LRU, then
> there's probably something better to free instead...

It mattered.  People noticed and complained.  In any case, as Andrew 
pointed out, we get the same effect, without long latencies, in a simplier 
manner with the current scheme.

Ed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/