Re: [PATCH] Linux 2.6: shebang handling in fs/binfmt_script.c

[Paul Jackson]

> Therefore the shell behaviour is not relevant, except for such scripts.

So we agree that the shell behaviour is relevant for such scripts.

I don't think I missed a thing, and I think we are in agreement, except
on the relative value of this change, versus the risk of breaking a
shell.

If a shell is coded to allow for at most one option before the script
file path, and if a script is presented to it with a shebang option
having an embedded space, then ... oops.

You're just discounting the risk of either such scripts or of such
stupidly coded shells more than I am discounting such, and you are
valuing the usefulness of the proposed change more than I value it.

I accept that there is no shell, nor script, on your system that would
break, and to be honest, I can't find any such shell, or script, on my
system either.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/