Re: [PATCH] fix shmat

From: Anton Blanchard
Date: Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:33:26 EST



> I'd be inclined to leave it as sys_shmat(). It is logically a syscall, and
> the fact that everyone except mips (and ia64) sticks a multiplexer in front
> of it is a sad historical note.

I still live in hope that we break it back out into syscalls on ppc32/64
one day.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/