Re: Why no interrupt priorities?
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri Feb 27 2004 - 07:06:27 EST
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:05:07AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> What's the rationale for not supporting interrupt priorities
> in the kernel?
What do you actually want to do them? Linux doesn't do the traditional
unix spl scheme for coplexity and performance reasons, see
www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/ana97/full_papers/small/small.ps
for a related paper. Give that linux hardirq handlers should be very small
there's no performance gain in that area for sane architectures, too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/