Re: [.config] CONFIG_THERM_WINDTUNNEL
From: Samuel Rydh
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 07:06:36 EST
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:27:28PM +0100, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Samuel Rydh wrote:
>
> > Btw, I would like to get reports about how well this driver works
> > with respect to noise reduction. I'm in particular interested
> > in the dual 1.4 GHz model...
>
> The author has a dual-1.2 and I tested it on another dual-1.2. I don't
> know if it has been tested on other mathines. The driver writes in
> the system logs the temperature and the fan speed every time they change,
> so you can check what it's doing (and you can unload the module if you
> see it does something wrong).
Yes I know... I wrote it :-)
It should be perfectly safe to use. It contains a (very conservative)
fail safe; if the temperature exceeds the working point by a few
degrees, the hardware overheat protection is programmed to turn
on the fans 100%. This works even if the kernel has locked up
solidly.
I'm mostly concerned that the working point is set too low for
the 1.4 Ghz machine. If it is, then there might be some unnecessary
noise. When the temperature is going down towards the working point,
the fan speed is increased to remove the last extra heat.
The assumption is that some temporary heat generating operation
has finished (like a CPU intensive calculation or heavy usage of
the graphics card). This is a good strategy if the working point
is correct but not-so-good if the working point is higher than
expected (cyclic fan behavior might occur).
In all cases, it should be an improvement compared to the firmware
setting which is incredibly noisy and usually causes short period
fan speed cycling.
/Samuel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/