Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads

[Robert Love]

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:20, Tom Sightler wrote:

> Well, I reported an issue on my laptop several weeks ago where network
> activity via my aironet wireless adapter would use 60-70% of the CPU but
> only when PREEMPT was enabled.  Looking back over the list I see other
> similar issues with PREEMPT and various network card drivers (8139too
> and ne2k show up), although most of those seem to be against preempt in
> 2.4.x not 2.6.

I've only seen these against 2.4, right?

> I think the user that started this thread was seeing significant
> regressions during kernel compiles with PREEMPT enabled while the system
> also has some additional load from Apache (perhaps with significant
> network activity).  I think there are cases like this where PREEMPT
> seems to trip up.

Well, Apache could definitely be the "issue" if it is using CPU time:
more time to Apache and less time to the compiles, assumingly by
design.  To really test kernel preemption's impact on throughput, you
need an idle system, otherwise you also test the improved preemptibility
and fairness.

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/