Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memorymachines.......

[Stephen Smalley]

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seems reasonable, although "vm_enough_acctdom" makes my eyes pop.  Why not
> keep the "vm_enough_memory" identifier?
> 
> I've asked Stephen for comment - assuming he's OK with it I'd ask you to
> finish this off please.

To keep the name, he needs to update all callers, right?  Current patch
appears to add a static inline for security_vm_enough_memory that
retains the old interface to avoid having to update most callers.

I don't have any fundamental problem with the nature of the change.  As
a side note, patch was malformed (at least as I received it), not sure
if that was just a problem on my end.

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/