Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7]

[Martin J. Bligh]

> On Thursday 18 March 2004 3:04 pm, Matthew Dobson wrote:
>> do most anything you'd want to do with a nodemask.  This stops us from
>> open-coding nodemask operations, allows non-consecutive node numbering
>> (ie: nodes don't have to be numbered 0...numnodes-1), gets rid of
>> numnodes entirely (replaced with num_online_nodes()), and will
>> facilitate the hotplugging of whole nodes.
> 
> My hero! :)  I think this has been needed for awhile, but now that I
> think about it, it begs the question of what a node is.  Is it a set
> of CPUs and blocks of memory (that seems to be the most commonly used
> definition in the code), just memory, just CPUs, or what?  On sn2
> hardware, we have the concept of a node without CPUs.  And due to our
> wacky I/O layout, we also have nodes without CPUs *or* memory!  (The
> I/O guys call these "ionodes".)  And then of course, there are CPUs
> that aren't particularly close to any memory (i.e. they have none of
> their own, and have to go several hops and/or through other CPUs to
> get at memory at all).

I think the closest answer we have is that it's a grouping of cpus and
memory, where either may be NULL. 

I/O isn't directly associated with a node, though it should fit into the 
topo infrastructure, to give distances from io buses to nodes (for which 
I think we currently use cpumasks, which is probably wrong in retrospect, 
but then life is tough and flawed ;-))

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/