Re: [PATCH 2.6] serialization of kernelcapi work

[Andrew Morton]

Armin Schindler <armin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > However you are limiting things so only a single CPU can run `work to do'
>  > at any time, same as with a semaphore.
> 
>  Well, limiting the 'work to do' to one CPU is exactly what I need to do,
>  the code must not run on another CPU at the same time.

Across the entire kernel?  For *all* ISDN connections and interfaces?

Surely there must be some finer-grained level at which the serialisation is
needed - per-inteface, per-connection, per-session, whatever?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/