On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Jeff Garzik spake thusly:
Clay Haapala wrote:
This patch agains 2.6.4 kernel code implements the CRC32C
algorithm. The routines are based on the same design as the
existing CRC32 code. Licensing is intended to be identical (GPL).
The immediate customer of this code is the wrapper code in
crypto/crc32c, available in another patch.
Why not call it 'crc32c' like its cousin crc32, rather than the
less-similar 'libcrc32c'? Violates the Principle of Least Surprise
;-)
Jeff
The module under crypto is call "crc32c", which would conflict, UIASM.