Re: 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 and direct_read_under and wb

From: Chris Mason
Date: Mon Mar 22 2004 - 13:34:05 EST


On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 13:10, Daniel McNeil wrote:
> Andrew and Chris,
>
> I re-ran the direct_read_under tests over the weekend on ext3 with
> the attached wb_rwsema patch and ran without errors.
>
> It looks like the same thing as before -- async writebacks are causing
> the sync writebacks to miss pages.
>
> Thoughts?
>
This hunk alone should be enough to force the sync writers to find a
page with locked but clean buffers.

diff -rup linux-2.6.5-rc1-mm2.orig/fs/buffer.c linux-2.6.5-rc1-mm2/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.6.5-rc1-mm2.orig/fs/buffer.c 2004-03-22 09:51:08.780141187 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.5-rc1-mm2/fs/buffer.c 2004-03-19 16:24:57.000000000 -0800
@@ -1814,8 +1814,7 @@ static int __block_write_full_page(struc
lock_buffer(bh);
} else {
if (test_set_buffer_locked(bh)) {
- if (buffer_dirty(bh))
- __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
+ __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
continue;
}
}


-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/