Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7]

[Paul Jackson]

> There is one issue and one issue only: the
> larger the "instruction set" grows, the more intrusive and complex-
> looking the thing appears, the more of quagmire merging it becomes.

Providing the additional mask "instructions" shouldn't create any quagmire.

It's the using of them that is intrusive.

Initially, some intrusive work, such as you (Bill) did was needed to get
masks implanted.  But now it should be appropriate to simply provide the
alternative calls that can make certain code sequences more efficient,
and then if someone complains that their old code sequence is too slow
or uses too much stack, we can recommend alternative code sequences that
will work better for them.

Passing the buck, division of labour and all that ...

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/