Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] Sysfs for framebuffer

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2004 13:26, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > - From a users point of view: if there are only to be framebuffer devices
> > > listed in this class, why not call it just what it is: "Framebuffer" ?
> > > Naming it after something it is only in a broad sense makes no sense to
> > > me. I'd be looking in /sys/.../framebuffer instead of /sys/.../graphics
> > > or /display.
> >
> > Notice that /display is what is used by most OF implementations, so this
> > kinda makes sense. I would vote like BenH on this if i was consulted.
>
> OF implementations?

Open Firmware

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/