Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on themerge?]

[Joel Jaeggli]

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> Wow. That cc list is growing. I'm going to trim it since those guys are
> subscribed to LKML or swsusp-devel anyway.
> 
> On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:45, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> > Speaking from an swsusp user (not developer) this is the best thing
> > imho. Some people just love eye candy :)
> 
> I think it's really important that we have some eye candy. This is going
> to be one of the most visible parts of the kernel, and for some people,
> it's going to be the thing they stare at most of the time when they
> start up/shut down. If we want to help the cause of Linux on the
> desktop, we want it to look good. As long as its within reasonable
> bounds, a small increase in kernel size is worth it, in my opinion.

I'd settle for just having something that worked, in a released kernel.  
the patch load I'm carrying around to make most of the hardware in my vaio
work is more of a shambling mound than a source of stability and
goodness...
 
> Nigel
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting 	       joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/