Re: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7]
From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Tue Mar 23 2004 - 23:41:44 EST
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> Any idea where this bogon might be?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:11:01PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something (quite possible), the following would
> expose the complement operators setting of high unused bits.
> You have 32 bit unsigned longs and NR_CPUS == 24, you complement
> some cpumask, and you then ask if it is empty, or ask if it is
> equal to another cpumask that differs only in the unused
> high byte, or ask its Hamming weight?
> The arithmetic cpumask ops don't mask off the unused bits above NR_CPUS.
> This might never be noticed, because cpumask_complement is the only op
> that sets these unused bits, the complement op is very rarely used, and
> none of its current uses can lead to the above bugs that I see offhand.
It's supposed to do this. bitmap_weight() masks off the trailing bits to
filter out "don't cares" from whole-word ops. Everything else operates
bitwise. Something like the following will keep the bits clear as you
wish, since apparently the more simplistic single-word ops aren't obeying
this. It's likely possible to better this by exploiting some invariants;
feel free improve on it.
-- wli
Index: pgcl-2.6.5-rc2/include/asm-generic/cpumask_arith.h
===================================================================
--- pgcl-2.6.5-rc2.orig/include/asm-generic/cpumask_arith.h 2004-03-19 16:11:33.000000000 -0800
+++ pgcl-2.6.5-rc2/include/asm-generic/cpumask_arith.h 2004-03-23 20:34:54.000000000 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
* to contain the whole cpu bitmap.
*/
+#if NR_CPUS % BITS_PER_LONG
+#define __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__ ((1UL << (NR_CPUS % BITS_PER_LONG)) - 1)
+#else
+#define __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__ (~0UL)
+#endif
+
#define cpu_set(cpu, map) set_bit(cpu, &(map))
#define cpu_clear(cpu, map) clear_bit(cpu, &(map))
#define cpu_isset(cpu, map) test_bit(cpu, &(map))
@@ -14,15 +20,15 @@
#define cpus_and(dst,src1,src2) do { dst = (src1) & (src2); } while (0)
#define cpus_or(dst,src1,src2) do { dst = (src1) | (src2); } while (0)
#define cpus_clear(map) do { map = 0; } while (0)
-#define cpus_complement(map) do { map = ~(map); } while (0)
-#define cpus_equal(map1, map2) ((map1) == (map2))
-#define cpus_empty(map) ((map) == 0)
+#define cpus_complement(map) do { map = ~(map) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__; } while (0)
+#define cpus_equal(map1, map2) (!(((map1) ^ (map2)) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__))
+#define cpus_empty(map) (!((map) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__))
#define cpus_addr(map) (&(map))
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
-#define cpus_weight(map) hweight32(map)
+#define cpus_weight(map) hweight32((map) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__)
#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
-#define cpus_weight(map) hweight64(map)
+#define cpus_weight(map) hweight64((map) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__)
#endif
#define cpus_shift_right(dst, src, n) do { dst = (src) >> (n); } while (0)
@@ -39,11 +45,13 @@
#define CPU_MASK_NONE ((cpumask_t)0)
/* only ever use this for things that are _never_ used on large boxen */
-#define cpus_coerce(map) ((unsigned long)(map))
+#define cpus_coerce(map) ((unsigned long)(map) & __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__)
#define cpus_promote(map) ({ map; })
#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ ((cpumask_t)1) << (cpu); })
#define first_cpu(map) __ffs(map)
#define next_cpu(cpu, map) find_next_bit(&(map), NR_CPUS, cpu + 1)
+#undef __CPU_MASK_VALID_BITS__
+
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_CPUMASK_ARITH_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/