Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?

From: John Hasler
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 19:41:01 EST


Stefan writes:
> Except the firmware itself is GPL in this case.

So the problem is not GPL compatibility: it's GPL code being distributed
without source. Can we get written permission from the manufacturer?
Without either source or written permission to do without we cannot
redistribute.

Note that the GPL does not require that the firmware build from source on
Linux. We are not obligated (by the GPL) to supply a compiler.
--
John Hasler You may treat this work as if it
john@xxxxxxxxxx were in the public domain.
Dancing Horse Hill I waive all rights.
Elmwood, Wisconsin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/