Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Well, I doubt anybody could take advantage of this optimization, since
> nobody can ship with hugetlbfs disabled anyways (peraphs with the
> exception of the embedded people but then I doubt they want to risk

Common. stop smoking that bad stuff.  Almost non-one except the known
oracle whores SuSE and RH need it.  Remeber Linux is used much more widely
except the known "Enterprise" vendors.  None of the NAS/networking/media
applicances or pdas I've seen has the slightest need for hugetlbfs.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/