Re: [Patch 24/23] mask v2 - Small system optimizations
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Sun Apr 04 2004 - 01:01:32 EST
Forget [Patch 24/23]. This patch is bad.
The C preprocessor does not bind symbols the way this patch requires.
With this patch, including both cpumask.h and nodemask.h in the same
header would end up with a broken mixture of implementations if cpumasks
were bigger than one word, but nodemasks not.
[Patch 24a/23] will be out shortly, replacing this patch.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/