Re: 2.6.5-mm1 [PATCH]
From: Andrew Morton
Date:  Mon Apr 05 2004 - 01:57:17 EST
Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Could I suggest an alternate version, below? It limits the knowledge of
>  the CONFIG_QUOTA option to the quota header file, and still shrinks the
>  inode by two pointers. The only functional difference between this and
>  Matt Mackall's version is the below will still leave in a call to
>  memset, but with a zero length. On the plus side, it keeps fs/inode.c
>  free of preprocessor noise, which seems worth the trade-off.
> 
>   quota.h |    4 ++++
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
>  diff -NurX ../dontdiff linus-2.6/include/linux/quota.h linus-2.6-inode-shrinkage/include/linux/quota.h
>  --- linus-2.6/include/linux/quota.h	2004-04-03 08:46:35.000000000 -0800
>  +++ linus-2.6-inode-shrinkage/include/linux/quota.h	2004-04-03 08:45:19.000000000 -0800
>  @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@
>   #define kb2qb(x) ((x) >> (QUOTABLOCK_BITS-10))
>   #define toqb(x) (((x) + QUOTABLOCK_SIZE - 1) >> QUOTABLOCK_BITS)
>   
>  +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>   #define MAXQUOTAS 2
>  +#else
>  +#define MAXQUOTAS 0
>  +#endif
The advantage of the ifdeffy one is that if someone accesses i_dquot
outside CONFIG_QUOTA, they get a compile failure rather than runtime inode
corruption.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/