Re: 2.6.5-mm1 [PATCH]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 01:57:17 EST
Ray Lee <ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Could I suggest an alternate version, below? It limits the knowledge of
> the CONFIG_QUOTA option to the quota header file, and still shrinks the
> inode by two pointers. The only functional difference between this and
> Matt Mackall's version is the below will still leave in a call to
> memset, but with a zero length. On the plus side, it keeps fs/inode.c
> free of preprocessor noise, which seems worth the trade-off.
>
> quota.h | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff -NurX ../dontdiff linus-2.6/include/linux/quota.h linus-2.6-inode-shrinkage/include/linux/quota.h
> --- linus-2.6/include/linux/quota.h 2004-04-03 08:46:35.000000000 -0800
> +++ linus-2.6-inode-shrinkage/include/linux/quota.h 2004-04-03 08:45:19.000000000 -0800
> @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@
> #define kb2qb(x) ((x) >> (QUOTABLOCK_BITS-10))
> #define toqb(x) (((x) + QUOTABLOCK_SIZE - 1) >> QUOTABLOCK_BITS)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
> #define MAXQUOTAS 2
> +#else
> +#define MAXQUOTAS 0
> +#endif
The advantage of the ifdeffy one is that if someone accesses i_dquot
outside CONFIG_QUOTA, they get a compile failure rather than runtime inode
corruption.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/