Re: Catching SIGSEGV with signal() in 2.6

[Jamie Lokier]

bero@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> ... doesn't seem to be possible anymore.
> 
> See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
> 
> Is this change intentional, or a bug?

On 2.6.3, x86, SIGSEGV is being caught just fine in my test program,
with the correct fault address, with or without SA_SIGINFO.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/