Re: [PATCH] Drop exported symbols list if !modules

[Brian Gerst]

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:45:01AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 06:55, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > > Drop ksyms if we've built without module support
> > >
> > > From: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: 2.6.1-rc1-tiny2
> >
> > Other than saving a little compile time, does this actually do anything?
> >
> > I'm not against it, I just don't think I see the point.
>
>
> Well it obviously saves memory and image size too; I'm in the process
> of merging bits from my -tiny tree. As bloat has a way of being
> well-distributed across the code base, it's going to take many small
> trimmings to cut it back. Most of the 150 or so patches I've got now
> save between 1 and 8k. Doesn't sound like much, but it adds up.

EXPORT_SYMBOL() is a no-op when modules are disabled:
$ size arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.o
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
      0       0       0       0       0 arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.o

Although, what really should be done is to move the exports to the 
appropriate files instead of keeping them lumped together.

--
				Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/