Re: kernel stack challenge
From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 22:11:55 EST
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Sergiy Lozovsky <serge_lozovsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| --- Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
| > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 00:52, Sergiy Lozovsky
| > wrote:
| > > (I don't want to start Holly War :-) but I think,
| > that
| > > Java is lower lavel than C, I recognize, that I
| > can be
| > > wrong)
| > Yes, you could..., but that's OT. Isn't LISP lower
| > level. Just
| > the names of it's instructions (Content of Address
| > part of Register and
| > Content of Decrement part of Register) imply that.
| > Shudddrdrrddrr. :-)
| >
| > I like Lisp, it's a hacker language, or was at
| > least.
| >
| > -- robin
|
|
| Sounds like music to me :-) If I would not be (very)
| familiar with LISP prior to that project, I would not
| chose it probably. It's syntax is so simple (it is a
| marvel :-) I would think twice to put in the kernel
| something with more complex syntax.
|
| After all Emacs uses LISP, too :-) Though it is this
| big one - Common Lisp :-)
I always knew that emacs was just another OS. 8;}
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/