Re: baycom_par dereference before check.

[Chris Wright]

* Dave Jones (davej@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:48:57PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>  > >Good point. Still doesn't strike me as particularly nice though.
>  > I would rather just remove the checks completely.  The success of any of 
>  > those checks is a BUG() condition that should never occur.
> 
> That works for me too. How about this?
> 
> 		Dave
> 
> --- linux-2.6.5/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_par.c~	2004-04-16 22:52:35.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.5/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_par.c	2004-04-16 22:52:53.000000000 +0100
> @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@
>  	struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
>  	struct baycom_state *bc = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
> -	if (!dev || !bc || bc->hdrv.magic != HDLCDRV_MAGIC)
> -		return;
> +	BUG_ON(!bc);

If it's adding a constant offset to dev, the bc would be non-NULL in a bug
case, no?

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/