Re: [PATCH] s390 (9/9): no timer interrupts in idle.
From: Martin Schwidefsky
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:32:27 EST
Hi Christoph,
> > +static inline void rcu_set_active_cpu_map(cpumask_t *mask)
> > +{
> > + cpumask_t active = idle_cpu_mask;
> > + cpus_complement(active);
> > + cpus_and(*mask, cpu_online_map, active);
> > +}
>
> This is a bit ugly. What about inlining the CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ case
> of this function in it's only caller and define idle_cpu_mask to
> an empty cpu mask for all other arches?
This would mean that all other arches need to do the above three
statements in rcu_start_batch. If this is acceptable we certainly
can introduce a global idle_cpu_mask. Where? sched.c?
> > + KERN_S390_HZ_TIMER=64, /* int: hz timer on or off */
>
> Kill the S390, this seems usefull for a bunch of other architectures.
Ok, makes sense.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
> > +extern unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(void);
> > +#endif
>
> kill the ifdef. externs don't need to be cpp'ed away.
Aye, aye, sir ;-)
blue skies,
Martin
Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/